The bank sent a request
You need to understand quickly which documents are required, what does not align and how to respond without triggering another request.
Currency control usually gets stuck not because of the deal itself, but because the documents do not form one clear story: the contract says one thing, the invoice another, the payment refers to a third basis, and supporting documents arrive later. We assemble the package, prepare explanations and help respond to the bank without chaotic correspondence.
We step in when the bank has already requested documents or when a transaction needs to be prepared for currency-control review in advance.
You need to understand quickly which documents are required, what does not align and how to respond without triggering another request.
The contract, invoice, act, payment order or declaration differ in amounts, timing, payment purpose or delivery terms.
The bank asks to explain the commercial substance, role of the parties, settlement structure or link between payment and delivery.
The response or closure deadline is approaching, while documents are coming from different teams and in different formats.
We assemble documents into one clear position for the bank: what happened, on what basis, which documents confirm it and what needs to be closed.
We read the request, identify the actual questions and separate mandatory documents from additional explanations.
We check the contract, invoice, act, declaration, payment documents, annexes and correspondence as one connected chain.
We show where amounts, dates, parties, payment purpose, delivery terms or document wording do not align.
We draft a calm and document-backed response explaining the transaction, why the documents look this way and what confirms the operation.
We help connect accounting, legal, the deal manager, supplier and bank so the response is consistent, not fragmented.
We help handle clarifications, complete the package and bring the documentary side to a clear outcome.
We separate normal document work from risky requests that can create bigger problems than the bank query itself.
We don't create fictitious documents or adjust a package to a transaction that did not actually exist.
We don't invent commercial substance retroactively if it is not supported by real documents.
We don't help bypass currency-control, tax or bank procedures.
We don't guarantee the bank's decision, but we help prepare the package and explanations so the position is clear and supportable.
The bank does not look at one file in isolation. It looks at the document chain. The documents should confirm the same story of the transaction.
If some documents are missing, we start with the bank request and the current package, then prepare a list of what should be requested from the counterparty or internal teams.
First we identify what exactly the bank is asking, then we assemble the documents and explanation into one clear position.
We review the bank's letter, response deadline, requested documents and possible reasons behind the request.
We compare the contract, invoice, payment, supporting documents and correspondence. We identify mismatches and missing materials.
We prepare the bank explanation, list of attachments and recommendations for corrections if the documents need to be brought into one logic.
We help request documents from the supplier, accounting, legal team or deal manager so the bank response is not incomplete.
We help submit the package, respond to clarifications and bring the documentary side to a clear outcome.
All details are anonymised — client confidentiality matters more than a portfolio.
A company received a bank request on an import transaction: the contract had one timeline, the invoice was issued later, the payment was made in parts, and supporting documents from the supplier contained an incomplete description. Accounting was preparing one response, the deal manager another, and the bank was asking follow-up questions.
We reviewed the contract, invoices, payment documents, supplier correspondence and proof of delivery. We identified mismatches, prepared one explanation of the transaction logic, a list of attachments and a short request to the supplier for missing documents.
The package was assembled into one structure: the bank received a coherent explanation of the operation and a set of supporting documents. The client reduced repeated correspondence between the bank, accounting and deal manager.
We will review which documents are needed, where the mismatches are and how to assemble the response to reduce the risk of repeated requests.